The subject of Confession seems to have hit the Blogosphere with a vengeance in the last day or so.
Curt Jester kicked it off (I think... though figuring out exactly
where something starts up is difficult, especially if it's a topic which comes up regularly!) Carolina Canonball was upset about
getting off lightly with her penances, and then followed it up with a post on
Confession-Lite.
Fr. Tim put up a very good (and informative) post about the
need for individual Confession. We would expect nothing less from a Professor of Sacramental Theology!! However, although this
ought to leave nothing more to say on the subject, I think another laywoman's view of the Sacrament has something to offer...
I was chatting to Fr. Tim on the subject earlier, and I made a remark about it being different when a priest goes to Confession. He disagreed, and said that there were all sorts of priests who had to go to Confession, just as there were all sorts of lay people. I don't think I made my point very well - what I meant to say was that I think that when a penitent announces that he's a priest, the confessor will think more carefully about what he says, and how he says it. I cannot believe that another priest would dare to tell Fr. Tim to confess only
one sin, for example... though maybe I'm wrong!
It is very difficult, as an ordinary lay woman, to find a good Confessor. I know it's not just me being fussy: whenever the subject comes up among friends, the first question asked is, "Who do you go to?" closely followed by, "Is he any good?"
Now, we're not stupid. We
know that the Sacrament is valid if the priest says the words of absolution (I'm not talking about major abuses like General Absolution, you understand) and so it doesn't "matter" what sort of penance you get and whether the priest is into the Classical Rite or is more in favour of
Novus Ordo. But sometimes the experience of going to Confession can be so ghastly that you wonder if it really is worth all the hassle. And if someone
is lucky enough to find a good Confessor, they will often move heaven and earth to make sure that they see this priest.
For example, I have been stopped in mid-confession and told that I only needed to focus on one or two sins. I've been in the situation where I needed to ask the priest what my penance was, since none seemed to be forthcoming. I have been asked, in a tone dripping with disapproval, whether I
"...always went to Confession
this often?" I've even been told that it wasn't good for a person to live alone, and that I should get married! (This was a few years before I had discerned that my vocation was to the single life, you understand)... It was somewhat discouraging, as I couldn't quite figure out how I could comply with that particular instruction. I was sorely tempted to ask whether the same rule applied to priests...
If we want to encourage more people to frequent the Sacrament of Confession, then it has to become less of a pot-luck experience.
Hmmn. Maybe we should start a "
Good Confession Guide"! We could award "five stoles" instead of "five stars"... Any thoughts?
You can read the full diagnostic criteria, indications for drug use, dosage instructions, contraindications and side effects HERE.
The subject of Confession seems to have hit the Blogosphere with a vengeance in the last day or so. Curt Jester kicked it off (I think... though figuring out exactly where something starts up is difficult, especially if it's a topic which comes up regularly!) Carolina Canonball was upset about getting off lightly with her penances, and then followed it up with a post on Confession-Lite.
Ok, time for a bit of theology (well, I can't keep posting about the weather, even if I am British!)
Hmmn. This one is difficult to figure out. Perhaps you lot out there can help...
Yippee! I have had over 130 hits on the blog today. Yes, I know... 130 is hardly the blogostratosphere... but it's nearly three times what I started with back in May.
