Lots of stuff has been written about the recent woes of Dr. Tina Beattie. She has complained that there is a blog campaign against her, and that is the reason she has had a couple of speaking engagements cancelled. There are some excellent summaries out there - Mark Lambert has the most comprehensive round-up, including links to Dr. Beattie's cries of victimisation.
Time to call a spade a shovel, I think.
Yes, several bloggers have written posts decrying her opinions, and expressing relief that she will not be given a platform at Catholic institutions to air her opinions.
However, this is not the "sovietisation" of the Church. This is what happens when faithful, orthodox Catholics (who are, quite frankly, totally hacked off at having her personal opinions touted as being compatible with Catholic teaching) get to demonstrate their democratic right to exercise free speech. That's what blogs are for - they allow those of us who wish to do so (without the benefit of friends in the mainstream media to give us a platform) to express our views to a wider audience.
Dr. Beattie's invitations to speak are extended to her in her capacity as a Catholic theologian. After all, that's the billing she gets in The Tablet. It's the description she gets given in the mainstream media. No-one contacts me to ask if I will talk on the teachings of the Church - I have no official standing. She is asked to speak solely on account of her position. If the views Dr. Beattie holds and expresses are not in accord with the teachings of the Church, (although she is at total liberty to hold and express those views) then it is no surprise that the invitations to speak at Catholic institutions are withdrawn.
Hardly rocket science, is it?
Dr. Beattie can think, say and write whatever she wants. She has that freedom. But she can't do it and honestly claim to be speaking as an authority on Catholic theology.
5 comments:
I agree totally...with you, not Tina!
Spot on, Mac. She's a rebel, and should be regarded as such.
Hear! Hear! You are absolutely spot-on.
I would add that people who talk about a "sovietisation" of the Church should grow up.
Where is the policeman's knock on the door at dead of night? Where the gulags? Where the abuse of psychiatry and psychotopic drugs? Where the show trials and summary executions?
I have been avoiding the bandwagon myself, as others seem to have it well covered. However, I was bemused by her statement of clarification, judging from which she seems to think that if she's talking to a group of Catholics, if she's invited by a diocese to give a talk etc, then she will of course be faithful to the Church, but when she is speaking as an academic who happens to be a Catholic then she can say what she likes.
No, Dr Beattie, it doesn't work like that. You are baptised and confirmed all the time, you can't take time off. If you use your position as an academic (whether you bill yourself as a Catholic professor or a professor who happens to be Catholic) to obtain a platform for expressing your opinions which are against the Church, you cannot expect that the Church will give you the authority and the platform to speak to the faithful.
Top summary, Mac. Succinct, accurate and helpful
Post a Comment