Last Friday, I put up a post highlighting the connection between the "Stand Up For Vatican II" crowd and the dissident group, Catholics for a Changing Church (CCC).
The objectives of CCC can be seen quite clearly from
their website - starting as a protest against the papal encyclical,
Humanae Vitae, they rapidly formed themselves into a pressure group... though in 1980 they claim to have been marginalised following the National Pastoral Congress in Liverpool, and subsequently they morphed into a "think-tank/study group."
They obviously haven't been studying the actual documents of Vatican II - as I
explained before, all the things they hold so very dear (Mass "facing the people" and in the vernacular, married and female clergy, the primacy of conscience, etc. etc.
ad infinitem... *yawns*) were actually
not called for by Vatican II, and were, in some of those cases, explicitly condemned.
Their "thinking" has also been somewhat ineffective: they state that they have
"...looked at the future form of the Christian faith. We feel that if we don’t like what is on offer, it is incumbent on us to advance our own ideas for wider discussion."
Hardly an example of the filial submission of mind and will to the authority of Holy Mother Church
envisaged by the Council!
I suspect that, in 1980, they were told as much... which is when they declared themselves "marginalised" (and, in all probability, terribly hurt and upset) because no-one would actually take them seriously.
Bernard Wynne, one of the main agitators in the
anti-Latin Mass campaign at Our Lady of the Rosary, Blackfen, who aired his "grievances" in
The Suppository, is the Chair of CCC. I wonder how many parishioners, who thought that maybe Mr. Wynne had a right to express his concerns about the liturgy, actually realised that he was also campaigning against Church teaching?
Of course, my openness in criticising the actions and aims of CCC has not gone unnoticed. My blog has come to the attention of another participant in the "Stand Up for Vatican II" coalition. Valerie Stroud,
the contact given for "We Are Church (UK)" sent an email round to the We Are Church Yahoo groups.
In it, she stated that
"The Daily Telegraph, a respected newspaper in my youth, employs Damien Thompson to write a fundamentalist blog on its website. There is also a woman "in private vows" called Mac McLernon who writes a blog called Mulier Fortis. They are so outraged by Catholics for a Changing Church's spearheading of the Stand Up for Vatican II campaign that they have found the time to create a rather nasty website of their own.
Do visit http://gcc4vat2.co.uk/ ..."
I am extremely flattered to be linked with
Damian Thompson and his blog in this way... I mean, wow, he's really big in the blogging stakes!! The CCC, WAC(UK) and IMWAC bunch must think I am a very talented writer... sadly, I cannot accept any of the credit for the
spoof website. I wish I could. All I did was
link to it... which, I think I'm right in saying, means that Valerie Stroud is indulging in libel. I hope she remembers to mention that in Confession...
She continues:
"It is highly offensive but mature adults are used to turning a blind eye to the juvenile antics of the young. I rather go along with the PR adage: "No publicity is bad publicity" You would have to be pretty stupid to give this spoof website any credibility.
The real CCC site will be found at http://www.ccc4vat2.co.uk/"
More (presumably unintentional) flattery. I haven't been called young for quite a while! And, personally, I'd have thought you'd have to be pretty stupid to imagine that the spoof website was supposed to be given any credibility...
The fact she felt the need to indicate that there is a real website made me chortle...
The defence of CCC by Valerie Stroud is interesting. WAC(UK) is a part of
IMWAC... and IMWAC has wacky ideas about the direction the Church should take, as
you can see:
We are Church: The Roman Catholic Church should accept the role of condoms in the prevention of HIV/Aids.
40 Years Encyclical "Humanae Vitae" – July 25th, 1968 "We Are Church" keeps calling for future-oriented Christian sexual ethics.
*yawn*